Boyer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “However, the trial court is not compelled to exclude the expert just because the testimony may cover matters within the average juror’s comprehension. See United States v. Hall, 93 F.3d 1337, 1342 (7th Cir.1996).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rafay
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-06-18· cited 125×
• Commonwealth v. Alicia
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-05-28· cited 68×
• Miller v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-06-26· cited 65×
• Tavares David Calloway v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2017-01-26· cited 33×
• LUNBERY v. Hornbeak
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-05-25· cited 31×
• Dominique Ray v. State of Alabama.
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2011-02-04· cited 29×
• People v. Harris
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-03-13· cited 26×
• Robert Pernell McCloud v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-11-17· cited 18×
• Walker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2015-02-06· cited 11×
• V.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-18· cited 7×
• Delice v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-28· cited 5×
• Edmonds v. State
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2006-04-25· cited 4×
• DORBAD v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-11· cited 3×
• Harrison v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-25· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Frye v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• United States v. Larry D. Hall
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-10-28· cited 180×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-08-25· cited 102×