District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/19/1989
Boyd v. State
Citations
- 546 So. 2d 132
- 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1718
- 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4028
- 1989 WL 78335
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “one purpose of punishment is deterrence, as it surely must be”
- noting that “one purpose of punishment is deterrence, as it surely must be”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Glickstein, Hersey, Letts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Palmer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-09-01· cited 230×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-06-22· cited 218×
- State v. EnmundSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-29· cited 104×
- Meadows v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-14· cited 11×
- Boatwright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-09-11· cited 5×
- Suarez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-06· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.