Utah Supreme Court· 3/5/1980
Boyce v. Boyce
Citations
- 609 P.2d 928
- 1980 Utah LEXIS 890
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that \a court should modify a prior decree when the interests of equity and fair dealing ... so require\
- noting that “[c]learly, a court should modify a prior decree when the interests of equity and fair dealing with the court and the opposing party so require”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, Crockett, Maughan, Wilkins, Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Paul v. PaulWyoming Supreme Court· 1980-07-29· cited 81×
- Katz v. PierceUtah Supreme Court· 1986-09-10· cited 35×
- Robinson v. BaggettCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2011-08-04· cited 14×
- Bayles v. BaylesCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1999-04-22· cited 10×
- Robinson v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2016-02-19· cited 10×
- Tuft v. Federal LeasingUtah Supreme Court· 1982-12-14· cited 9×
- Marshall v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1996-04-11· cited 8×
- In Re Adoption of BTDCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2003-04-03· cited 7×
- Despain v. DespainUtah Supreme Court· 1984-05-01· cited 5×
- Shelton v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-11-15· cited 2×
- Bhongir v. ManthaCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2016-05-12· cited 2×
- Gunderman v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2003-04-03· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.