S.D. Ohio· 3/1/1996
Bowling v. Pfizer, Inc.
Citations
- 922 F. Supp. 1261
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5077
- 1996 WL 185162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- awarding attorneys’ fees of $10.25 million, or 10%, where the court valued the settlement at $102.5 million
- “Counsel were confronted with myriad complex legal and factual questions in bringing this action and in negotiating the settlement. The structure of the settlement agreement approved by the Court reflects this fact.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nangle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bowling v. Pfizer, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1996-12-12· cited 129×
- Lealao v. Beneficial California, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2000-07-10· cited 95×
- Bowling v. Pfizer, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1998-01-05· cited 35×
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationD. New Jersey· 1997-03-20· cited 25×
- In Re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2001-03-08· cited 21×
- In Re Sulzer Hip Prosthesis and Knee Prosthesis Liability LitigationN.D. Ohio· 2003-06-12· cited 20×
- In Re Copley Pharmaceutical, Inc.D. Wyoming· 1998-04-30· cited 20×
- Great Neck Capital Appreciation Investment Partnership, L.P. v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, L.L.P.E.D. Wisconsin· 2002-11-06· cited 16×
- In re Southern Ohio Correctional FacilityS.D. Ohio· 1997-04-22· cited 15×
- Dick v. Sprint Communications Co.W.D. Kentucky· 2014-01-30· cited 12×
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationD. New Jersey· 2000-07-18· cited 10×
- In re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 1999-03-05· cited 8×
- Gonzales v. FelkerN.D. Ohio· 1997-02-05· cited 2×
- Bowling v. PfizerSixth Circuit· 1998-01-05
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2002-05-15
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court· 1984-03-21· cited 7,642×
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court· 1939-04-24· cited 1,255×
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court· 1980-02-19· cited 897×
- In Re General Motors Corporation Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation. Jack French, Robert M. West, Charles E. Merritt, Gary Blades, Dawn and Tracey Best, Gary and Jackie Barnes, Betty Marteny, John and Mary Southands, Edmund Berning, Dale W. Plummer, Edmund and Anneta Casey, John aThird Circuit· 1995-04-17· cited 850×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1994-03-23· cited 303×
- William Weinberger v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.First Circuit· 1991-02-11· cited 259×
- Unnamed caseSixth Circuit· 1980-01-17· cited 249×
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BrownSupreme Court· 1988-10-03· cited 198×
- Oliver S. Brown v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Etc., Mobil Oil Corporation, Ashland Oil, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1988-03-02· cited 178×
- Gottlieb v. BarryTenth Circuit· 1994-12-09· cited 146×
- Seventy-two Thousand, Nine Hundred & Forty Dollars in United States Currency v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-10-02· cited 136×
- Skelton v. General Motors Corp.Seventh Circuit· 1988-10-14· cited 133×
- In re Domestic Air Transportation Antitrust LitigationN.D. Georgia· 1993-03-22· cited 127×
- Ramey v. Cincinnati Enquirer, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1974-12-26· cited 116×
- Rawlings v. Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1993-11-10· cited 114×
- Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp.Supreme Court· 1995-10-02· cited 113×
- Knez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 97×
- Harman v. Lyphomed, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1991-10-09· cited 91×
- Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. of Phila. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Third Circuit· 1973-10-31· cited 63×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.