D. Rhode Island· 8/23/2008
Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.
Citations
- 582 F. Supp. 2d 192
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67150
- 2008 WL 4694549
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing patentee to testify in support of his royalty damages without expert testimony
- “This Court has an obligation to safeguard the virtually sacrosanct privacy of the attorney-client privilege ----”
- awarding costs for trial demonstratives
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William E. Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2013-03-29· cited 25×
- Osorio v. One World Technologies, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2011-11-17· cited 11×
- United States Ex Rel. Maxwell v. Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp.D. Colorado· 2011-06-02· cited 8×
- Roggio v. GrasmuckD. Massachusetts· 2014-03-12· cited 3×
- McDermott v. Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C.D. Massachusetts· 2014-09-30· cited 3×
- Chaves v. Ruhland (In re Ruhland)D. Massachusetts· 2013-05-13· cited 1×
- Tikkun v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 2010-02-17· cited 1×
- Coldwell Banker v. Brian MosesD. New Hampshire· 2010-09-08
Cites
55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2007-04-05· cited 625×
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.S.D. New York· 1970-05-28· cited 503×
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 494×
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationFederal Circuit· 1995-03-15· cited 461×
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1978-04-25· cited 369×
- William Templeman and Alyce Templeman v. Chris Craft CorporationFirst Circuit· 1985-08-16· cited 322×
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1992-11-30· cited 214×
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers Inc.Second Circuit· 1971-10-12· cited 197×
- Digital Control v. The Charles MacHine Works (Also Known as Ditchwitch)Federal Circuit· 2006-02-08· cited 180×
- Lama Romero v. AsociacionFirst Circuit· 1994-03-02· cited 179×
- Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1991-02-26· cited 152×
- Howard A. Fromson v. Western Litho Plate and Supply Co. And Bemis Company, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsFederal Circuit· 1988-08-04· cited 141×
- Harris Corporation v. Ericsson, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2005-08-05· cited 139×
- Twm Manufacturing Co., Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellants v. Dura Corp. And Kidde, Inc., Appellants/cross-AppelleesFederal Circuit· 1986-04-25· cited 138×
- American Medical Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Medical Engineering CorporationFederal Circuit· 1993-12-06· cited 134×
- Haroco, Incorporated, Roman Ceramics, Incorporated, California Originals, Incorporated v. American National Bank and Trust Company of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1994-10-19· cited 127×
- Unisplay, S.A. v. American Electronic Sign Co., Inc., and Luke G. WilliamsFederal Circuit· 1995-12-28· cited 125×
- Alflex Corporation v. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1990-09-13· cited 117×
- Cargill, Inc. v. Canbra Foods, Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2007-02-14· cited 116×
Other cases named Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.
6 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2005-04-11· cited 9×
- Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.D. Rhode Island· 2007-05-30· cited 3×
- Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2008-11-25
- Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2008-11-25
- Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2008-12-17
- Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2008-12-17
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.