Bowlin v. Hekla Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that compliance with a condition precedent was required absent a waiver by the insurance company
• same for 30-day requirement, unless waiver could be shown

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ermentrout v. Girard Fire & Marine Insurance
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1895-12-24· cited 56×
• Nathe Bros., Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-08-03· cited 50×
• Mason v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1901-01-30· cited 27×
• Sterling State Bank v. Virginia Surety Company
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-12-19· cited 26×
• Shapiro v. Western Home Insurance
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1892-11-04· cited 9×
• Keil Motor Co. v. Royal Insurance Co., Ltd., of Liverpool
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1933-09-22· cited 8×
• Shapiro v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1895-05-22· cited 6×
• McCollum v. North British & Mercantile Insurance
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1896-02-25· cited 6×
• Winthrop & Weinstine v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.
  D. Minnesota· 1998-02-17· cited 5×
• Nathe Bros., Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-07-27· cited 3×
• Royal Insurance v. Silberman
  Cuyahoga Circuit Court· 1904-11-18· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lohnes v. Insurance Company of North America
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1877-01-08· cited 15×
• Sharpe v. Rogers
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1866-07-15· cited 7×