Skip to main content
· 12/19/1969

Sterling State Bank v. Virginia Surety Company

Citations

  • 173 N.W.2d 342
  • 285 Minn. 348
  • 1969 Minn. LEXIS 988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noncompliance with condition precedent of proof of loss is “fatal to recovery” under theft-insurance policy
  • policy requirements of notice and proof of loss allow insurer opportunity to investigate claims
  • finding similar policy provision condition precedent to recovery
  • notice of loss was a condition precedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knutson, Nelson, Murphy, Otis, Rogosheske

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.