Indiana Supreme Court· 8/19/1985
Bowens v. State
Citations
- 481 N.E.2d 1289
- 1985 Ind. LEXIS 933
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appellant’s argument under Ind. Criminal Rule 4(A) was moot as, “[i]f [appellant] lost any rights, as he now complains, it was the right to be released on bond because of his incarceration for a period of six months”
- because defendant made no motion to strike and admonish, he is foreclosed from challenging the admission of the challenged testimony on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pivarnik, Givan, Debruler, Prentice, Hunter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kremer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-11-10· cited 60×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-03-06· cited 56×
- Thompson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-04-25· cited 49×
- Mills v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-09-10· cited 44×
- Lewis v. IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-08-27· cited 41×
- House v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-03-02· cited 17×
- State ex rel. Michael Bramley v. Tipton Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-08-26· cited 15×
- Matter of Guardianship of PoseyIndiana Court of Appeals· 1988-12-22· cited 11×
- Maez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1988-12-01· cited 8×
- Dickerson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-02-04· cited 8×
- Powers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-10-27· cited 6×
- David Dimmett v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-07-16
- Dongwook Ko v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2024-09-20
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Armstrong v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-01-07· cited 76×
- Suggs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-12-02· cited 28×
- Randall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-02-19· cited 27×
- Sandlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-04-19· cited 24×
- Kizer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-02-07· cited 15×
- Chicago Park District v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court· 1986-01-23· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.