Skip to main content

Bowens v. State

Citations

  • 481 N.E.2d 1289
  • 1985 Ind. LEXIS 933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellant’s argument under Ind. Criminal Rule 4(A) was moot as, “[i]f [appellant] lost any rights, as he now complains, it was the right to be released on bond because of his incarceration for a period of six months”
  • because defendant made no motion to strike and admonish, he is foreclosed from challenging the admission of the challenged testimony on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pivarnik, Givan, Debruler, Prentice, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.