Skip to main content
· 12/1/1988

Maez v. State

Citations

  • 530 N.E.2d 1203
  • 1988 Ind. App. LEXIS 937
  • 1988 WL 126983

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[t]he continued absence of a defendant who knows of his obligation to be in court, when coupled with a failure to notify the court and provide it with an explanation, constitutes a knowing and voluntary waiver.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Garrard, Conover

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.