Bowen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• improper comments about defendant's criminal background did not require reversal because evidence independently supported conviction for burglary
• improper comments about defendant’s criminal background did not require reversal because evidence independently supported conviction for burglary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thompson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-23· cited 107×
• Richeson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-15· cited 48×
• Schaefer v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-05-23· cited 13×
• Giles v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-08-05· cited 10×
• Jerry K. Thompson v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-23

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Lockhart v. Fretwell
  Supreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,956×
• State v. Van Cleave
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-19· cited 447×
• Hardin v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-03-29· cited 133×
• Edgecomb v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-11-01· cited 98×
• Burkes v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-03-08· cited 32×
• Lloyd v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-08-07· cited 19×
• Messer v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1987-06-30· cited 8×
• Bowen v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-11-26· cited 2×