Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 8/24/2001

Bowen v. Rubin

Citations

  • 213 F. Supp. 2d 220
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24684
  • 2001 WL 1914427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • presuming that “the proposed guardians, being attorneys, [understood] their fiduciary obligations to plaintiffs and their roles as officers of the Court”
  • stating that a litigant consenting to the appointment of a guardian ad litem shows that the litigant is “willing to constrain [his] control over this litigation and face the possible resulting stigma associated with guardianship”
  • granting plaintiff’s motion to appoint guardian ad litem because plaintiff submitted declarations from treating psychiatrists
  • appointing guardians ad litem where plaintiffs submitted declarations from treating psychiatrists
  • appointing guardians ad litem where plaintiffs submitted declarations from treating psychiatrists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.