Skip to main content
· 11/8/1990

Carl Stephen Thomas v. J.W. Humfield

Citations

  • 916 F.2d 1032
  • 18 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 293
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court \may apply any procedure [for determining competency] that meets the requirements of due process\
  • holding that district court “may apply any procedure [for determining competency] that meets the requirements of due process”
  • holding that a party to litigation is entitled to notice and a hearing before the court declares him incompetent and appoints a GAL
  • finding that the law of an individual’s domicile determines their competence to sue on their own behalf for purposes of Rule 17(c)
  • stating that the district court \may apply any procedure that meets the requirements of due process\
  • observing that the appointment of a guardian 16 ad litem implicates due process concerns because it deprives a litigant of the right to control litigation 17 and subjects them to possible stigmatization

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rubin, Garwood, Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.