· 11/8/1990
Carl Stephen Thomas v. J.W. Humfield
Citations
- 916 F.2d 1032
- 18 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 293
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19621
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that district court \may apply any procedure [for determining competency] that meets the requirements of due process\
- holding that district court “may apply any procedure [for determining competency] that meets the requirements of due process”
- holding that a party to litigation is entitled to notice and a hearing before the court declares him incompetent and appoints a GAL
- finding that the law of an individual’s domicile determines their competence to sue on their own behalf for purposes of Rule 17(c)
- stating that the district court \may apply any procedure that meets the requirements of due process\
- observing that the appointment of a guardian 16 ad litem implicates due process concerns because it deprives a litigant of the right to control litigation 17 and subjects them to possible stigmatization
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rubin, Garwood, Higginbotham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.