Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 4/16/2001
Bowen v. Bowen
Citations
- 547 S.E.2d 877
- 345 S.C. 243
- 2001 S.C. App. LEXIS 57
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating family court has jurisdiction to determine if property is nonmarital; once it determines it nonmarital, there is no continuing jurisdiction over said property
- “As a general matter, the provisions in chapter 61 on alimony do not exist to displace nuptial agreements; rather the statutes exist to set the principles when there is no agreement.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stilwell, Hearn, Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Felts v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-01-21· cited 108×
- Hayne Federal Credit Union v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-08-11· cited 88×
- Lollis v. LollisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-04-06· cited 51×
- Moser v. GosnellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-03-01· cited 21×
- Pearson v. Church of GodSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-12-09· cited 20×
- Bowen v. BowenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-07-21· cited 19×
- McDowell v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-12-21· cited 10×
- Donnan Ex Rel. Owens v. MarinerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-04-03· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.