Bowen v. Bowen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the presumption of a resulting trust or a gift did not apply because a husband and wife \had a clear understanding as to the ownership of conveyed property according to [their] antenuptial agreement\
• holding when real estate is conveyed to a child and consideration is paid by the parent, the presumption is that the purchase was a gift to the child, and thus, no resulting trust arises

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Holler v. Holler
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-04-18· cited 27×
• Settlemeyer v. McCluney
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-05-11· cited 10×
• In Re Brittain
  D. South Carolina· 2010-08-16· cited 9×
• Stribling Ex Rel. Stribling v. Stribling
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-06-26· cited 8×
• Anderson v. Architectural Glass Construction, Inc. (In Re Pfister)
  Fourth Circuit· 2014-04-17· cited 5×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hayne Federal Credit Union v. Bailey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-08-11· cited 88×
• Lollis v. Lollis
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-04-06· cited 51×
• Bowen v. Bowen
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-07-21· cited 19×
• McDowell v. South Carolina Department of Social Services
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-12-21· cited 10×
• Bowen v. Bowen
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-04-16· cited 6×