Skip to main content

Bowden v. State

Citations

  • 166 S.W.3d 466
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 4117
  • 2005 WL 1244755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jury entitled to consider inconsistent statements as proof of guilt in prosecution for reckless injury to a child
  • holding that jury entitled to consider inconsistent statements as proof of guilt in prosecution for reckless injury to a child
  • holding that jury entitled to consider inconsistent statements as proof of guilt in prosecution for reckless injury to a child
  • holding that jury entitled to consider inconsistent statements as proof of guilt in prosecution for reckless injury to a child
  • holding that jury was entitled to consider inconsistent statements as proof of guilt in prosecution for reckless injury to a child
  • holding that jury was entitled to consider inconsistent statements as proof of guilt in prosecution for reckless injury to a child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livingston, Dauphinot, Gardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.