Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1/17/1989
Bosworth v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 375 S.E.2d 756
- 7 Va. App. 567
- 5 Va. Law Rep. 1581
- 1989 Va. App. LEXIS 5
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the threat of obtaining a warrant if K-9 unit alerted on vehicle was not coercion
- stating that if K-9 unit dog alerted on vehicle a warrant could be obtained did not amount to coercion
- a suspect’s consent to search was not coerced even though it was given after officer stated he could obtain a search warrant if a drug dog alerted to her car
- consent held not to be a product of coercion when given subsequentto police statement that a search warrant could be obtained if K-9 dog responded positively to check of vehicle
- “A motorist stopped by police for a traffic infraction is not subject to the protections prescribed by Miranda until he is subjected to treatment that places him in custody.” (internal citations omitted)
- “Furthermore, any factual disputes about what occurred at the scene and whether the troopers coerced the defendant were resolved by the trial court and, since they are not plainly wrong, cannot be disturbed on appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barrow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-06-16· cited 115×
- James v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-08-02· cited 73×
- Deer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-02-22· cited 61×
- Thomas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-11-16· cited 20×
- J.D. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-01-28· cited 18×
- Middlebrooks v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-08-05· cited 14×
- Harris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-01-30· cited 13×
- Lowery v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-01-16· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. MilnerCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-01-24· cited 9×
- Douglas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-12-06· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. SwartzFairfax County Circuit Court· 2003-12-16· cited 1×
- JD v. Com.Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-01-28
- Commonwealth v. StretchVirginia Beach County Circuit Court· 1989-09-08
- Commonwealth v. BenitezChesterfield County Circuit Court· 1990-02-20
- Commonwealth v. SlaughterLynchburg County Circuit Court· 1993-07-20
- Commonwealth v. DavisRoanoke County Circuit Court· 2000-05-05
- Commonwealth v. PennVirginia Circuit Court· 2003-01-13
- Commonwealth v. VanceAugusta County Circuit Court· 2012-08-09
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 1,598×
- Maryland v. MacOnSupreme Court· 1985-06-17· cited 625×
- United States v. Milton HawkinsThird Circuit· 1987-02-03· cited 181×
- United States v. Ben Lee Basey, Armando Jose Lopez, and Oscar Quirarte Ponce, DefendantsFifth Circuit· 1987-05-28· cited 170×
- Iglesias v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-09-06· cited 117×
- Wass v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-09-01· cited 73×
- Tarwid v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-11-16· cited 73×
- United States v. CalventeSecond Circuit· 1983-11-15· cited 62×
- Taylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-05-17· cited 54×
- Glesby L. Dabney v. Orville Freeman, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States of AmericaD.C. Circuit· 1966-02-24· cited 51×
- State v. GarlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-09-06· cited 28×
- McFadden v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1983-03-11· cited 27×
- May v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-10-21· cited 20×
Other cases named Bosworth v. Commonwealth
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.