Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2/1/1993
Boswell v. Zephyr Lines, Inc.
Citations
- 606 N.E.2d 1336
- 414 Mass. 241
- 1993 Mass. LEXIS 21
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a claim for unjust enrichment “presupposes that no valid contract covers the subject matter of a dispute”
- noting that Massachusetts courts “attempt to construe [statutes] in harmony with other related statutes and rules so as to give rise to a consistent body of law”
- noting that courts should look to related statutes for interpretive guidance
- noting that courts should look to related statutes for interpretive guidance
- related statutes must be construed in harmony with one another “so as to give rise to a consistent body of law”
- courts should look to related statutes for interpretive guidance \so as to give rise to a consistent body of law\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Liacos, Abrams, Nolan, Lynch, Greaney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationS.D. New York· 2017-06-30· cited 72×
- Okmyansky v. Herbalife International of America, Inc.First Circuit· 2005-07-15· cited 64×
- Ropes & Gray LLP v. Jalbert (In Re Engage, Inc.)First Circuit· 2008-10-06· cited 54×
- Casseus v. E. Bus Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2018-02-08· cited 52×
- Commonwealth v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-04-25· cited 49×
- Malonis v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-10-18· cited 36×
- Global NAPs, Inc. v. AwiszusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-08-09· cited 35×
- Marco v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-07-08· cited 34×
- Finard & Co. v. Sitt Asset ManagementMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-04-07· cited 34×
- Hopkins v. MedeirosMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-02-24· cited 32×
- Ropes & Gray LLP v. JalbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-07-28· cited 30×
- Orbusneich Medical Co. v. Boston Scientific Corp.D. Massachusetts· 2010-03-18· cited 29×
- York v. Zurich Scudder Investments, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-06-26· cited 27×
- Eyssi v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-08-26· cited 25×
- MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. v. Department of Telecommunications & EnergyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-06-21· cited 24×
- PGR Management Co. v. CredleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-06-11· cited 22×
- Craft v. KaneMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-05-24· cited 20×
- Curly Customs, Inc. v. Pioneer FinancialMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2004-09-22· cited 19×
- Cohen v. LindseyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1995-01-05· cited 16×
- Smith v. ConsalvoMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-08-22· cited 15×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Board of Education v. Assessor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-08-18· cited 179×
- Industrial Finance Corp. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-04-09· cited 111×
- Kashmir Corp. v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court· 1980-09-10· cited 42×
- Kashmir Corp. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-11-05· cited 32×
- Rodriguez v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals· 1985-11-14· cited 31×
- Chemprene, Inc. v. X-Tyal International Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1982-02-09· cited 28×
- Torphy v. RederMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1970-04-03· cited 25×
- Kennedy v. B. A. Gardetto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1940-06-03· cited 24×
- Elbaum v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1962-07-02· cited 22×
- Brown v. FalesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1885-02-27· cited 18×
- Hahn v. Oregon Physicians' ServiceNinth Circuit· 1985-11-27· cited 11×
- Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorD.C. Circuit· 1991-08-09· cited 10×
- Serlin v. RotmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-12-13· cited 8×
- Crabb v. Robert R. Anderson Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1969-12-05· cited 6×
- Nickel Rim Mines Ltd. v. Universal-Cyclops Steel Corp.D. New Jersey· 1962-02-09· cited 5×
- Aldrich v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1870-01-15· cited 4×
- Gil-Wal Corp. v. Painewebber, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1990-04-09· cited 3×
- Doherty v. GinsburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1963-11-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.