Orbusneich Medical Co. v. Boston Scientific Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, “[a]s a general matter . . . contractual choice of law provisions apply only to issues of substantive law and do not govern questions of procedural law that may arise in a contractual dispute” (citations omitted)
• “The public filing of [a] document with a regulatory agency [] makes it a proper subject of judicial notice, at least with regard to the fact that it contains certain information, though not as to the truth of its contents.”
• relying on without reference clause to avoid choice-of-law analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).