Skip to main content
· 11/24/2010

Boston Scientific Corp. v. Duberg

Citations

  • 754 F. Supp. 2d 1033
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130843
  • 2010 WL 4970022

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining “Competitive Product” and providing examples: “[s]uch products include, but are not limited to, cardiac pacemakers, implantable defibrillators . . . resynchronization devices, and leads”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard H. Kyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.