Medtronic, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. S. Todd Gibbons, an Individual

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the choice of law rules “of the forum state control which substantive law should apply” and applying forum state’s law to determine the validity and enforceability of a contractual choice-of-law provision
• holding that the choice of law rules “of the forum state control which substantive law should apply” and applying forum state’s law to determine the validity and enforceability of a contractual choice of law provision
• explaining that decisions on preliminary injunctions also lack preclusive effect
• affirming a preliminary injunction enforcing a restrictive covenant in an employment contract
• “[T]he granting or denial of a preliminary injunction . . . is not a final judgment for the purposes of collateral estoppel.”
• loss of customers and good will gives rise to an irreparable injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).