Bordelon v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e count on cross-examination ... to ferret out the truth from any and all witnesses, and to gain a fuller understanding of the import of their testimony.”
• “When new material is developed on redirect examination, recross-examination must be allowed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Childers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-02· cited 27×
• Parrish v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-25· cited 4×
• Celeste Chambers v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-10-04· cited 4×
• Steel Dynamics Inc.-New Millennium v. Markham
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-25· cited 3×
• State v. Hamner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-25· cited 2×
• Sandoval v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-03· cited 1×
• Napoleon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-30
• K.Q.W. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-09

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. Alaska
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
• Sanders v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-01-22· cited 20×
• Belsky v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-11· cited 20×
• Kelly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-08· cited 8×
• Simmons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-08· cited 7×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-25· cited 7×
• Baucham v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-24· cited 6×
• Barr v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-30· cited 1×