Skip to main content

Booth v. State

Citations

  • 262 P.3d 255
  • 151 Idaho 612
  • 2011 Ida. LEXIS 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Court will not disturb the trial court’s factual findings if supported by substantial evidence
  • holding that the Court will not disturb the trial court’s factual findings if supported by substantial evidence
  • noting analysis focuses on petitioner’s state of mind when pleading guilty
  • “but for [counsel’s] erroneous advice regarding the possibility of a fixed life sentence, Booth would have elected to proceed to trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Horton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.