Booth v. Black & Decker, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excluding testimony based on training and experience as opposed to testing; although method was intuitively appealing, it was not based on objective anchor of testing
• excluding expert testimony because the expert did not offer any source for his conclusion beyond “his own training and experience”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).