Booker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it is not necessary to redefine “deadly weapon” in application paragraph when it was defined in abstract portion of jury charge and that charge required jury to determine whether defendant used or exhibited deadly weapon before finding defendant guilty of aggravated robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bargas v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-05-13· cited 283×
• Holley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-22· cited 70×
• Rogers v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1994-08-17· cited 28×
• Kent v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1994-04-14· cited 22×
• Fortenberry v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1995-03-22· cited 13×
• Ford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-02· cited 12×
• Jason Myers Gibson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-07-02
• George Michael Bargas, Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-05-13
• Corey Davis-Grant v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2021-10-08
• Salvador Sanchez v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2025-01-31