Supreme Court of Minnesota· 5/25/2011
Bonga v. State
Citations
- 797 N.W.2d 712
- 2011 Minn. LEXIS 275
- 2011 WL 2020781
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that a defendant’s “irrational behavior” and demeanor are relevant to the court’s determination of whether there is reason to doubt their competency
- noting that a suicide attempt during trial was relevant with respect to competence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Barry, Meyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HokansonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-10-03· cited 65×
- State v. HallmarkSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-05-15· cited 36×
- Dikken v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-06-21· cited 16×
- State v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-12-19· cited 5×
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-05-15· cited 4×
- State of Minnesota v. Joshua Henry Baion CummingsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2024-02-14
- State of Minnesota v. Kou YangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-06-17
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 3,039×
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
- State v. CamachoSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-03-20· cited 76×
- State v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-08-20· cited 54×
- Bonga v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-05-28· cited 24×
- State v. FinneganSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-06-30· cited 24×
- State v. GanpatSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-06-07· cited 12×
- Shoen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-07-25· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.