Skip to main content

Bolmer v. Kocet

Citations

  • 6 Conn. App. 595
  • 507 A.2d 129
  • 1986 Conn. App. LEXIS 899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[although the plaintiffs did not specifically label [the unjust enrichment] count as being in the alternative to the first and second counts, it is clear that it is meant to provide an alternative basis for recovery in the event of a failure of proof under those counts”
  • “Although the plaintiffs did not specifically label [the unjust enrichment count] as being in the alternative to the [contractual counts], it is clear that it is meant to provide an alternative basis for recovery in the event of a failure of proof under those counts.”
  • “[a]lthough the plaintiffs did not specifically label [the unjust enrichment] count as being in the alternative to the first and second counts, it is clear that it is meant to provide an alternative basis for recovery in the event of a failure of proof under those counts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bieluch, Borden, Daly, Other

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.