Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a]bsent a statutory warranty or definitive contract language, the determination of what the parties intended to compass in their contractual commitments is a question of the intention of the parties, and an inference of fact”
• “Absent ... definitive contract language, the determination of what the parties intended to encompass in their contractual commitments is ... an inference of fact[ ]”
• \supplemental bodies of law cannot displace those provisions of the Code that are directly applicable\
• “[S]upplemental bodies of law cannot displace those provisions of the [UCC] that are directly applicable.”
• parol evidence rule applies to integrated agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).