District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2/12/1993
Bolle v. Hume
Citations
- 619 A.2d 1192
- 1993 D.C. App. LEXIS 33
- 1993 WL 33492
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that parol evidence is inadmissible \to show an intention contrary to that expressed in an unambiguous written contract\
- explaining that a \constructive trust is an appropriate remedy for combatting [sic] unjust enrichment\ and that \inequitable conduct . . . need not rise to [the] level of actual fraud\ to justify the imposition of a constructive trust
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwelb, Farrell, Mack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- National Electrical Manufacturers Association v. Gulf Underwriters Insurance CompanyFourth Circuit· 1998-12-29· cited 31×
- Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-08-20· cited 27×
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. National Reo Management, Inc.District of Columbia· 2000-07-26· cited 18×
- Claytor v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-08-03· cited 17×
- Richardson v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-06-12· cited 15×
- Sutton v. Banner Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-12-30· cited 9×
- Cusimano v. First Maryland Savings & Loan, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-03-15· cited 8×
- Estate of Reap v. MalloyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-04-01· cited 5×
- Robert Goodrich v. Bank of America N.A.D.C. Circuit· 2025-05-06· cited 4×
- McLaughlin v. Hartford Life & Annuity Ins. Co.D.C. Circuit· 2017-10-25· cited 3×
- Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. MadoleDistrict of Columbia· 1999-03-29· cited 1×
- Chen v. Bell-SmithDistrict of Columbia· 2011-03-08
- Natl Electrical v. Gulf UnderwritersFourth Circuit· 1998-12-29
- McLaughlin v. Hartford Life & Annuity Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia· 2017-10-25
- Newton v. NewtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-06-11
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-11-09· cited 300×
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-01-20· cited 225×
- 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-12-20· cited 148×
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-08-21· cited 110×
- Howard University v. Good Food Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-04-28· cited 53×
- Harrington v. EmmermanD.C. Circuit· 1950-11-16· cited 45×
- Sacks v. RothbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-01-24· cited 44×
- Graff v. MalawerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-06-11· cited 43×
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AbramsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-09-15· cited 34×
- Gray v. GrayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-03-28· cited 34×
- Ozerol v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-08-11· cited 30×
- Hertz v. KlavanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-06-02· cited 24×
- Cohn v. CohnD.C. Circuit· 1948-12-29· cited 23×
- Spencer v. SpencerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-06-26· cited 20×
- Mandley v. BackerD.C. Circuit· 1941-04-21· cited 15×
- Swift v. SwiftDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-11-21· cited 13×
- Government Employees Insurance v. Group Hospitalization Medical Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-02-14· cited 8×
- Estate of Bowden v. AldridgeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-08-13· cited 8×
- Richards v. LilesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-08-27· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.