Skip to main content
· 4/28/1992

Howard University v. Good Food Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 608 A.2d 116
  • 1992 D.C. App. LEXIS 114
  • 1992 WL 89151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the obligation to indemnify depends on the equities of the case and relationship between the parties
  • finding that the obligation to indemnify depends on the equities of the case and relationship between the parties
  • explaining that courts must look to “the conduct and language of the parties and the surrounding circumstances” in ascertaining intent, without simply focusing on “[t]he document alone”
  • setting forth surrounding circumstances as one focus of the inquiry into whether the parties intended an agreement to be completely integrated
  • setting forth basis for determining the preliminary factual issue of whether the parties intended a writing to be integrated
  • discussing the Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 90 (Am. Law. Inst. 1979)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Ferren, Steadman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.