Bold v. Bold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the husband’s monthly payments to the wife were not alimony, but “equitable reimbursement” for contributions the wife made while husband sought his chiropractic degree
• holding that the husband’s monthly payments to the wife were not alimony, but “equitable reimbursement” for contributions the wife made while husband sought his chiropractic degree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Schenk v. Schenk
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-07-19· cited 97×
• Perlberger v. Perlberger
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-06-02· cited 71×
• Xinda Wang v. Zhiping Feng
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-13· cited 56×
• Zullo v. Zullo
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-16· cited 36×
• Twilla v. Twilla
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-09-05· cited 32×
• Wagoner v. Wagoner
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-09-29· cited 25×
• Guy v. Guy
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1999-04-22· cited 20×
• O'Callaghan v. O'Callaghan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-18· cited 17×
• Long, M. v. Long, C.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-08-02· cited 5×
• Audra Marian Guy v. Robert Sidney Guy, Jr.
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1997-11-20
• Bouder v. Cantu
  Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas· 1991-10-22

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hodge v. Hodge
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-12-29· cited 34×
• Lehmicke v. Lehmicke
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-01· cited 21×
• Bold v. Bold
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-05· cited 10×