Boire v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “district court need only decide that the Board’s theories of law and fact are not insubstantial or frivolous”
• finding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in denying temporary relief after a three-month delay
• finding that the movant’s three-month delay in seeking injunctive relief “is not determinative of whether relief should be granted”
• finding that the Board wait ing three months before petitioning for an injunction was “some evidence that the detrimental effects of the discharges have already taken their toll”
• emphasizing that “[t]he Board waited three months” before filing a § 10(j) petition
• cautioning against issuing bargaining orders where the employees had not previously been represented by a union.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Boire v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Boire v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 5×
• Boire v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1975-10-17· cited 1×