Skip to main content
· 11/4/2010

Overstreet v. El Paso Disposal, L.P.

Citations

  • 625 F.3d 844
  • 189 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2673
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 22987
  • 2010 WL 4351961

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a district court could issue an injunction based in part on evidence that the employer’s activities had been “a direct cause” of anti-union sentiment and that the actions “led to several petitions to decertify the Union as the workers’ representative”
  • affirming temporary injunction which reinstated workers because denying the relief “would merely reward EPD for its - unfair labor practices”
  • “In light of the Court’s pronouncement in New Process Steel, we feel no compulsion to follow Laurel Baye.”
  • “Because the ALJ’s fact finding here aided the district court’s adjudication of Overstreet’s 8 petition, delay alone is not dispositive.”
  • approving of case affirming eighteen month delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Wiener, Elrod

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.