Bohling v. Tecumseh Poultry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, under Nebraska law, claim preclusion bars the subsequent litigation of “matters actually litigated” and those “which might have been litigated in the prior action”
• to be considered by appellate court, alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief of party asserting error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Saylor v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2023-09-22· cited 13×
• Hohenstein v. Hohenstein
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2023-08-15
• Mumin v. Chef Lee, Taste of New Orleans
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2023-10-17

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Simons v. Simons
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2022-08-05· cited 44×
• Hara v. Reichert
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2014-03-07· cited 36×
• Diedra T. v. Justina R.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2023-02-03· cited 28×
• Schaeffer v. Frakes
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2023-01-27· cited 16×
• Trausch v. Hagemeier
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2023-02-17· cited 15×
• Swift v. Dairyland Insurance
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-05-10· cited 13×
• Simpson v. City of North Platte
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1983-09-23· cited 13×
• McKinney v. Okoye
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2014-01-31· cited 10×
• In re Interest of Antonio J.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2016-10-28· cited 1×