Mumin v. Chef Lee, Taste of New Orleans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that only those voters residing in an allegedly unconstitutionally drawn voting district have standing to challenge the unconstitutionality of the voting district
• holding that only those voters residing in an allegedly unconstitutionally drawn voting district have standing to challenge the unconstitutionality of the voting district
• recognizing that courts “refuse[] to recognize a generalized grievance against allegedly illegal governmental conduct as sufficient for standing to in- voke the federal judicial power”
• concluding that, by definition, article III standing is not an affirmative defense
• holding that while a plaintiff residing in a racially gerrymandered district had standing to challenge the redistricting, a plaintiff not residing in such a district lacked standing to challenge the redistricting
• concluding that, by definition, article III standing is not an affirmative defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).