Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 8/30/1999

Bogovich v. Sandoval

Citations

  • 189 F.3d 999
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 9045
  • 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1204
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7074
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 20675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There is no reason to believe that ADA claims should be treated any differently than § 1983 claims when examining whether a prisoner’s case should have been brought under habeas corpus.”
  • “[A]lthough courts must construe pro se complaints liberally, . . . courts should not undertake to infer in one cause of action when a complaint clearly states a claim under a different cause of action.”
  • applying rule to ADA claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Bogovich v. Sandoval

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.