Skip to main content
· 2/2/2001

Scott v. Stephen Dunn & Associates

Citations

  • 241 F.3d 652

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing bounds of trial judge discretion to admit cell tower data
  • officer testified to \what he 'expected' a particular telephone would be most likely to do here\
  • defendant's use of racial epithet at time of murder relevant to show motive, revenge, and intent to harm
  • \evidence may be relevant if it only 'throw[s] light' on an issue\ [citation omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paez, Schroeder, Sneed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.