· 2/2/2001
Scott v. Stephen Dunn & Associates
Citations
- 241 F.3d 652
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing bounds of trial judge discretion to admit cell tower data
- officer testified to \what he 'expected' a particular telephone would be most likely to do here\
- defendant's use of racial epithet at time of murder relevant to show motive, revenge, and intent to harm
- \evidence may be relevant if it only 'throw[s] light' on an issue\ [citation omitted]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paez, Schroeder, Sneed
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.