Skip to main content

Boatwright v. State

Citations

  • 933 S.W.2d 309
  • 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 4553
  • 1996 WL 593525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although defendant and counsel were not present when the trial court responded to the jury’s note, defendant was still required to timely object when he returned to the courtroom and learned of the judge’s action or file a bill of exceptions
  • although defendant and counsel were not present when the trial court responded to the jury's note, defendant was still required to timely object when he returned to the courtroom and learned of the judge's action or file a bill of exceptions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Murphy, Neill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.