Second Circuit· 3/4/1994
Blum v. Schlegel
Citations
- 18 F.3d 1005
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “the efficient provision of services” by a university “actually depends, to a degree, on the dissemination 12 in public fora of controversial speech”
- noting that private motives such as \facing termination for personal consumption of marijuana\ or \trying to evade or discredit a drug testing program\ might mean that employee speech advocating the legalization of marijuana was not protected
- explaining that a university’s “efficient provision of services . . . actually depends, to a degree, on the dissemination in public fora of controversial speech implicating matters of public concern”
- explaining that a university’s “efficient provision of services . . . actually depends, to a degree, on the dissemination in public fora of controversial speech implicating matters of public concern”
- finding “no due process right” where plaintiff has “no right to demand” that defendants enforce zoning law
- affirming district court’s holding that there was no adverse action where Plaintiff consented to postponing his tenure review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittSecond Circuit· 1996-03-25· cited 568×
- Diesel v. Town of LewisboroSecond Circuit· 2000-11-09· cited 292×
- Sousa v. RoqueSecond Circuit· 2009-08-21· cited 135×
- Monroe Hale v. Louis Mann, Deputy Commissioner, Sued in His Individual Capacity and the State of New York Office of Children and Family ServicesSecond Circuit· 2000-05-25· cited 107×
- Nicholas Meriwether v. Francesca HartopSixth Circuit· 2021-03-26· cited 83×
- Clarkson v. CoughlinS.D. New York· 1995-06-16· cited 79×
- Moray v. City of YonkersS.D. New York· 1996-04-17· cited 73×
- Internation Dairy Foods Ass'n v. AmestoySecond Circuit· 1996-08-08· cited 73×
- Brooks v. GiulianiSecond Circuit· 1996-05-31· cited 61×
- Frisenda v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF MALVERNEE.D. New York· 2011-03-31· cited 55×
- Nicastro v. RunyonS.D. New York· 1999-07-29· cited 47×
- Birmingham v. OgdenS.D. New York· 1999-10-08· cited 46×
- Suffolk Parents of Handicapped Adults v. WingateSecond Circuit· 1996-11-04· cited 30×
- Rankel v. Town of SomersS.D. New York· 2014-02-25· cited 30×
- Morrison v. JohnsonSecond Circuit· 2005-11-10· cited 27×
- Camacho v. BrandonS.D. New York· 1999-07-16· cited 21×
- Vanderhurst v. Colorado Mountain College DistrictTenth Circuit· 2000-04-11· cited 19×
- Heim v. DanielSecond Circuit· 2023-08-30· cited 19×
- Lehmuller v. Incorporated Village of Sag HarborE.D. New York· 1997-09-25· cited 17×
- Linder v. City of New YorkE.D. New York· 2003-03-13· cited 17×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 7,445×
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 6,021×
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,562×
- Rankin v. McPhersonSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,766×
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1960-12-12· cited 1,729×
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Second Circuit· 1979-03-23· cited 1,003×
- Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 951×
- Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York CitySupreme Court· 1956-04-09· cited 744×
- Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsSupreme Court· 1986-06-11· cited 526×
- The Coca-Cola Company v. Tropicana Products, Inc.Second Circuit· 1982-09-29· cited 301×
- Laureyssens v. Idea Group, Inc.Second Circuit· 1992-05-15· cited 164×
- Arnold R. Vasbinder, Cross-Appellee v. Gordon Ambach, Basil Y. Scott, and Richard M. Switzer, Basil Y. Scott and Richard M. Switzer, Cross-AppellantsSecond Circuit· 1991-02-28· cited 103×
- Blum v. SchlegelSecond Circuit· 1994-03-04· cited 100×
- Bernal-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-06-10· cited 86×
- Nemer Jeep-Eagle, Inc. v. Jeep-Eagle Sales CorporationSecond Circuit· 1993-04-28· cited 39×
- Polymer Technology Corp. v. MimranSecond Circuit· 1992-09-11· cited 30×
- Ezekwo v. Nyc Health & Hospitals CorporationSecond Circuit· 1991-08-01· cited 19×
- Blum v. SchlegelW.D. New York· 1993-07-01· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.