Blum v. Schlegel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the efficient provision of services” by a university “actually depends, to a degree, on the dissemination 12 in public fora of controversial speech”
• noting that private motives such as \facing termination for personal consumption of marijuana\ or \trying to evade or discredit a drug testing program\ might mean that employee speech advocating the legalization of marijuana was not protected
• explaining that a university’s “efficient provision of services . . . actually depends, to a degree, on the dissemination in public fora of controversial speech implicating matters of public concern”
• explaining that a university’s “efficient provision of services . . . actually depends, to a degree, on the dissemination in public fora of controversial speech implicating matters of public concern”
• finding “no due process right” where plaintiff has “no right to demand” that defendants enforce zoning law
• affirming district court’s holding that there was no adverse action where Plaintiff consented to postponing his tenure review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).