Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/16/1967
Bloom v. HILTY
Citations
- 210 Pa. Super. 255
- 232 A.2d 26
- 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 494
- 1967 Pa. Super. LEXIS 991
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The rule applies to actions between the parties to an instrument and their representatives or those claiming under them_”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ervin, Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bloom v. HiltySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-11-14· cited 24×
- Horizon Financial, F.A. v. HansenN.D. Georgia· 1992-02-11· cited 20×
- Kay Automotive Warehouse, Inc. v. McGovern Auto Specialty, Inc. (In Re McGovern Auto Specialty, Inc.)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-08-05· cited 18×
- McCarthy v. BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-12-29· cited 8×
- Gibson v. Steger (In Re Gibson)N.D. Illinois· 1981-10-06· cited 2×
- Lantzy v. Velest Coal Co.Cambria County Court of Common Pleas· 1968-05-20
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- CASTERLINE v. GMACSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-06-15· cited 20×
- Casterline v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-06-15· cited 13×
- Packard Motor Car Co. v. MazerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1921-07-14· cited 6×
- MacK v. FerebeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-09-17· cited 4×
- Wilson, Sieger & Co's. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1850-05-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.