· 2/11/1992
Horizon Financial, F.A. v. Hansen
Citations
- 791 F. Supp. 1561
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6701
- 1992 WL 96776
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that, under Pennsylvania law, attorney for borrower has duty to lender bank to whom attorney issued opinion letters expressly for bank's benefit
- holding under Pennsylvania law that attorney for borrower has duty to lender bank to whom attorney issued opinion letters expressly for bank's benefit
- contract choice of law rule applied
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Forrester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.