Skip to main content
· 2/11/1992

Horizon Financial, F.A. v. Hansen

Citations

  • 791 F. Supp. 1561
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6701
  • 1992 WL 96776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, under Pennsylvania law, attorney for borrower has duty to lender bank to whom attorney issued opinion letters expressly for bank's benefit
  • holding under Pennsylvania law that attorney for borrower has duty to lender bank to whom attorney issued opinion letters expressly for bank's benefit
  • contract choice of law rule applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forrester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.