Ninth Circuit· 7/2/1996
Bland v. Fessler
Citations
- 88 F.3d 729
- 24 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2072
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 7982
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4944
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15829
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding state anti-robocall statute because exemptions were based on existing relationships and were therefore reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions
- “The Attorney General of California has not stated affirmatively that his office will not enforce the ... statute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- White v. LeeNinth Circuit· 2000-09-27· cited 786×
- LSO, Ltd. v. StrohNinth Circuit· 2000-03-06· cited 229×
- Italian Colors Restaurant v. Xavier BecerraNinth Circuit· 2018-01-03· cited 50×
- State of Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene TribeNinth Circuit· 2015-07-22· cited 46×
- Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionNinth Circuit· 2000-08-04· cited 37×
- Culinary Workers Union v. Del PapaNinth Circuit· 1999-12-27· cited 36×
- Patriotic Veterans, Incorporat v. State of IndianaSeventh Circuit· 2017-01-03· cited 24×
- Peace Ranch, LLC v. Rob BontaNinth Circuit· 2024-02-13· cited 22×
- Maryland v. Universal ElectionsD. Maryland· 2011-05-25· cited 19×
- Victory Processing, LLC v. Tim FoxNinth Circuit· 2019-09-10· cited 12×
- Conant v. McCaffreyN.D. California· 1997-04-30· cited 12×
- Vermont Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. SorrellD. Vermont· 1998-09-09· cited 11×
- Soundboard Association v. United States Federal Trade CommissionDistrict of Columbia· 2017-04-24· cited 6×
- Tri-State Development, Ltd. v. JohnstonNinth Circuit· 1998-10-30· cited 6×
- Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionNinth Circuit· 1999-01-14· cited 5×
- Citizens for Free Speech, LLC v. County of AlamedaN.D. California· 2014-08-05· cited 5×
- Democratic National Committee v. WatadaD. Hawaii· 2002-04-11· cited 3×
- California First Amendment Coalition v. CalderonNinth Circuit· 1998-04-28· cited 2×
- Gresham v. PickerE.D. California· 2016-10-07· cited 2×
- Venetian Casino Resort, L.L.C. v. CortezD. Nevada· 2000-05-01· cited 1×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 3,406×
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1974-03-19· cited 2,574×
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,526×
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-05-24· cited 2,355×
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,255×
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 2,028×
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court· 1973-02-26· cited 1,432×
- Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 1,207×
- Epperson v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1968-11-12· cited 1,145×
- Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court· 1949-02-28· cited 1,120×
- Waters v. ChurchillSupreme Court· 1994-05-31· cited 1,041×
- Carey v. BrownSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 986×
- Virginia v. American Booksellers Assn., Inc.Supreme Court· 1988-01-25· cited 975×
- Martin v. City of StruthersSupreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 839×
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica FoundationSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 761×
- Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 745×
- Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human RelationsSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 707×
- Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central CommitteeSupreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 706×
- Lehman v. City of Shaker HeightsSupreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 685×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.