Bisson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that store customer was a business invitee insofar as she was “invited to enter or remain on land for a purpose directly or indirectly connected with business dealings with the possessor of the land”
• ‘‘this court will presume [that] trial court acted properly in performance of its duties’’
• ‘‘this court will presume [that] trial court acted properly in performance of its duties’’
• “We have reviewed the surveillance video recording and disagree with the plaintiff’s contention that it depicts precisely where [employee] was looking at the time of her safety sweep in the main aisle just prior to the plaintiff’s fall.”
• ‘‘[m]ere assertions of fact . . . are insufficient to establish the existence of a material fact and, therefore, cannot refute evidence properly presented to the court [in support of a motion for summary judgment]’’ (inter- nal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hughes
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-11-23· cited 30×
• Dushay v. Southern Connecticut Hockey League, LLC
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2025-08-26· cited 5×
• Goody v. Bedard
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-10-06· cited 3×
• Allen v. Shoppes at Buckland Hills, LLC
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-07-27· cited 2×
• Walencewicz v. Jealous Monk, LLC
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2024-10-01· cited 2×
• Hill v. OSJ of Bloomfield, LLC
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-09-15· cited 1×
• Watson Real Estate, LLC v. Woodland Ridge, LLC
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-10-05· cited 1×
• Kristin R. Brosnan v. Stan Woodman and Myra Woodman d/b/a Aragon Tap
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2019-08-07
• Margarum v. Donut Delight, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2022-02-08
• In re Paulo T.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2022-07-18

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Scott v. Harris
  Supreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 13,305×
• Considine v. City of Waterbury
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-09-12· cited 84×
• Gulycz v. Stop & Shop Companies
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-11-17· cited 65×
• Kelly v. Stop & Shop, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-04-03· cited 47×
• Webster Bank v. Flanagan
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-02-16· cited 46×
• Baptiste v. Better Val-U Supermarket, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-12-10· cited 41×
• Doe v. Town of W. Hartford
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-02-27· cited 36×
• White v. E & F CONSTRUCTION CO.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1963-06-25· cited 30×
• McCrorey v. Heilpern
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-02-10· cited 25×
• Rafalko v. University of New Haven
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-05-24· cited 24×
• State v. Fetscher
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-04-13· cited 24×
• James v. Valley-Shore Y.M.C.A., Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-11-23· cited 14×
• Martin v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Companies, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-06-04· cited 12×
• Colombo v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-11-20· cited 9×
• Gargano v. Azpiri
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-09-23· cited 7×
• Cadle Co. v. Ogalin
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2017-07-25· cited 6×
• Palmieri v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-08-07· cited 3×
• Hellamns v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-12-31· cited 3×
• Magsig v. Magsig
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2018-07-03· cited 2×