McCrorey v. Heilpern

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no reasonable basis for jury’s finding of constructive notice because plaintiff proffered no evidence that defective condition existed for any period of time before plaintiffs injury
• Supreme Court reversed judgment in favor of plaintiff and remanded with direction to render judgment for defendant where plaintiff produced no evidence regarding length of time hole in floor outside plaintiff's apartment had existed
• whether the defendant had constructive notice of a condition depends on whether the condition existed for a sufficient length of time for the defendant, in the exercise of due care, to discover the defect in time to remedy it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).