Bishop v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he court did not clearly err by finding that a search was justified by the exigent circumstances created when an active methamphetamine lab was found in the trunk of a car . . . .” (emphasis added)
• “[T]he court did not clearly err by finding that a search was justified by the exigent circumstances created when an active methamphetamine lab was found in the trunk of a car . . . .” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Meeks
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2008-09-02· cited 176×
• King v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2010-01-21· cited 19×
• Michael Fred Wehrenberg v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-11-08· cited 9×
• Hall v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2014-01-10· cited 8×
• Piercy v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2010-01-29· cited 6×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Coolidge v. New Hampshire
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
• Chambers v. Maroney
  Supreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
• McDonald v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 1,736×
• United States v. Hal M. Atchley
  Sixth Circuit· 2007-01-23· cited 90×
• United States v. Leslie Delynn Chambers
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-02-02· cited 78×
• Welch v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2004-11-18· cited 73×
• Jackson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2006-03-29· cited 62×
• Commonwealth v. McManus
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2003-06-12· cited 24×
• Cooper v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1979-01-19· cited 23×
• Mash v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1989-05-04· cited 20×
• Cormney v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1996-12-13· cited 11×
• Hallum v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2007-03-23· cited 8×