Bishop v. Bishop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellate court was required to presume the evidence supported the trial court’s findings regarding the division of marital property in the absence of an evidentiary record
• explaining that “[a] partial evidentiary record would not exclude the possibility that other evidence tilted the balance in favor of the [court’s] findings”
• explaining that “[a] partial evidentiary record would not exclude the possibility that other evidence tilted the balance in favor of the [court’s] findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kathy H. Wright v. James Charles Wright
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2011-06-30
• Sylvester Young v. Bank One, N.A.
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2004-09-20
• Christopher Hooven v. Johnnia Hooven
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2002-08-20
• Eldridge v. Eldridge
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1999-09-29
• Robbins v. Money
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-07-22
• Cathleen Jackson v. Roger L. Kash
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2013-10-22
• Brenda Dianne Cook Rayfield v. Tony Dale Rayfield
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2014-05-06
• Jennifer Scarlett Robbins Goodman v. Temitope \Michael\ Bamiji Ogunmola
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2014-09-04
• Timothy James Hardin v. Veronica Hensley-Hardin
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2015-12-18
• Sherita Michelle Polk v. Frank Edward Polk
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2019-07-16

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Sherrod v. Wix
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1992-10-14· cited 350×