Skip to main content
· 10/14/1992

Sherrod v. Wix

Citations

  • 849 S.W.2d 780
  • 1992 Tenn. App. LEXIS 848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that without an appellate record containing the facts, the court must assume that the record, had it been preserved, would have contained sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s factual findings
  • holding that without an appellate record containing the facts, the court must assume that the record, had it been preserved, would have contained sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s factual findings
  • holding that without an appellate record containing the facts, the Court “must assume that the record, had it been preserved, would have contained sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s factual findings.”
  • holding that without an appellate record containing the facts, the court must assume that the record, had it been preserved, would have contained sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s factual findings
  • holding that without an appellate record containing the facts, the court must assume that the record, had it been preserved, would have contained sufficient evidence to support the trial court's factual findings
  • holding that without an appellate record containing the facts, the court must assume that the record, had it been preserved, would have contained sufficient evidence to support the trial court's factual findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koch, Lewis, Cantrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.