· 1/31/1994
Daigle v. Maine Medical Center, Inc.
Citations
- 14 F.3d 684
- 38 Fed. R. Serv. 1044
- 28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 911
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1499
- 1994 WL 17058
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- approving the district court's use of a Maine statute's evidentiary provisions in a diversity case
- “All claims that law enforcement officers have used 15 excessive force —deadly or otherwise—in the course of an arrest must be analyzed 16 under the Fourth Amendment and its ‘reasonableness’ standard.”
- \A federal court sitting in diversity jurisdiction and called upon in that role to apply state law is absolutely bound by a current interpretation of that law formulated by the state's highest tribunal.\
- collecting cases and applying raise-or-waive rule to omitted constitutional challenges
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffin, Cyr, Selya
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.