Billings v. Maass

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the prior failure of the petitioner to appeal the resetting of his parole release date by the parole board meant that habeas corpus relief was not available to him
• “The remedy of habeas corpus is not available to parties who neglect to seek appellate review of the challenged decision.”
• \The remedy of habeas corpus is not available to parties who neglect to seek appellate review of the challenged decision.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Grinols v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2000-10-13· cited 46×
• Meadows v. Schiedler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-08-28· cited 42×
• Bartz v. State of Oregon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-01-15· cited 14×
• Alexander v. Gower
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-06-01· cited 10×
• Higgins v. Briggs
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1994-06-24· cited 7×
• Sager v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-07-14· cited 2×
• Smith v. Oregon Board of Parole
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-09-11· cited 2×
• Lambert v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2002-04-26· cited 1×
• Munson v. Maass
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-11-18· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barber v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1957-03-27· cited 38×
• Raudebaugh v. Action Pest Control, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-09-15· cited 17×
• Gordon v. State Board of Parole
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-09-02· cited 2×