Appellate Court of Illinois· 10/8/1997

Billerbeck v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.

Citations

685 N.E.2d 1018
292 Ill. App. 3d 350
226 Ill. Dec. 563
1997 Ill. App. LEXIS 709

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

a reviewing court may, at its discretion, go beyond the question presented to review the order giving rise to the appeal
as part of a Rule 308 review, the court is not limited to answering the question, but may address the propriety of the order giving rise to the appeal
as part of a Rule 308 review, the court is not limited to answering the question, but may address the propriety of the order giving rise to the appeal
While “defendant was arguably not prejudiced by the delay[,]” [a]ccording to Womick, the presence of actual knowledge and the absence of prejudice do not require this court to find reasonable diligence.”
discussing Schrock and scope of Rule 308 review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Billerbeck v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Billerbeck v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-10-08· cited 1×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.